Employment Relations Authority

Nats policy will see wages slashed - unions

Body:

The Government and trade unions say National's employment relations policy will cut wages, despite the party saying it will retain core provisions of the Employment Relations Act (ERA) if it wins the election.

National's leader, John Key, gave an assurance today the basic principles of the ERA would remain in place. "We are staying with the Employment Relations Act. We are not going back to the Employment Contracts Act," he said. "Good faith provisions will still apply, as will rights to sick leave, holidays, and health and safety provisions."

Mr Key said National would keep four weeks annual leave but allow employees to trade the fourth week for cash.

Labour Minister Trevor Mallard described the policy as "a return to the bad old days" with no protection for new employees, an erosion of the Holidays Act and a power shift in favour of employers. National's policy contains the previously-announced provision for a 90-day probation period for new employees and says there will be a review of the Holidays Act. Mr Mallard described the probation period as a "fire at will" provision which would mean lower pay and would force new employees into a trial period without any protection against unfair or unreasonable treatment. And he said a review of the Holidays Act was National Party code for cutting the pay of sick people.

The Engineering, Printing and Manufacturing Union (EPMU) said the policy would drive down the wages of all workers. "Every point in this policy is an attack on current worker rights and every point would put downward pressure on wages," said EPMU national secretary Andrew Little.

Council of Trade Unions president Helen Kelly said there was no mention in the policy of how it would lift wages and predicted holiday pay would be cut.

The National Distribution Union's secretary, Laila Harre, said the policy was a wolf in sheep's clothing. "It is a gift to employers, wrapped in the language of `reasonableness'," she said. "This policy will keep wages down. . .the attempt to shift the balance of power in a workplace even more towards employers is dressed up in weasel words."

Business New Zealand said the policy had the capacity to deliver economic growth if it was partnered by other pro-growth policies. "A period of restraint and consolidation along with enhancement of basic rights is likely to be beneficial," Business NZ chief executive Phil O'Reilly said. "The vast majority of employers will welcome the commitment to review the Holidays Act which has been widely criticised for its complexity and costliness to apply." National's industrial relations spokeswoman, Kate Wilkinson, said the policy was balanced and the response was hysterical. "There is no threat to worker rights, collective bargaining will continue, there is no attack on entitlements, there is no plan to cut holidays and there is no plan to privatise ACC," she said. "It's the same tired old hysterical rubbish we've heard from Labour all week."

The main points of National’s policy are:
- Introduce a 90-day trial period for new staff, by agreement between the employer and employee, in businesses with fewer than 20 people;
- Continue to allow union access to workplaces with an employer's consent, which cannot be unreasonably withheld;
- Continue to support the social partnership with Business NZ and the Council of Trade Unions to work together on issues of mutual interest;
- Restore workers' rights to bargain collectively without having to belong to a union;
- Retain the Mediation Service but ensure it is properly resourced with properly qualified mediators;
- Require the Employment Relations Authority to act judicially in accordance with the principles of natural justice, including the right to be heard, and the right to cross-examine before an impartial referee;
- Allow injunctions and important legal questions to be heard in the first instance in the Employment Court, and allow a general right of appeal to the Court of Appeal;
- Keep four weeks annual leave but allow employees to request trade of the fourth week for cash. This can be only at the employee's request and cannot be raised in negotiations for an agreement; and
- Appoint a working party to review the Holidays Act, especially the issue of 'relevant daily pay'.

Employment law change, but no shakeup under Nats

Body:

National has confirmed if it is elected to power it will largely retain the Employment Relations Act (ERA).

National leader John Key told a business breakfast meeting in Wellington the basic principles of the ERA – such as that of good faith bargaining – would remain in place. "We are staying with the Employment Relations Act. We are not going back to the Employment Contracts Act," Mr Key said.

Mr Key said his party's industrial relations policy would keep the ERA in place, but introduce a 90 day trial period for firms with fewer than 20 staff.

"Good-faith provisions will still apply, as will rights to sick leave, holidays, and health and safety provisions. Rules of natural justice and human rights legislation will apply. Mediation will be available in disputes, and employers won't be able to hire and fire the same employee every 90 days," Mr Key said.

National did not see the 90 day trial period as making it easier for employers to fire people, but easier to hire them. Every OECD country, except Denmark, had a probationary period. National has dropped its 2005 policy of restricting union access to work places, but will allow workers to bargain collectively without having to belong to a union.

Mr Key said National would also keep four weeks annual leave, but allow employees to trade the fourth week for cash.

This could only be at the employee's request and could not be raised in negotiations for an agreement.

A National government would also:
* Retain the Mediation Service but ensure it was properly resourced with properly qualified mediators;
* Require the Employment Relations Authority to act judicially in accordance with the principles of natural justice, including the right to be heard, and the right to cross examine before an impartial referee;
* Allow injunctions and important legal questions to be heard in the first instance in the Employment Court, and allow a general right of appeal to the Court of Appeal; and
* Appoint a working party to review the Holidays Act, especially the issue of relevant daily pay.

Canterbury woman takes parents to court over pay

Body:

A woman has taken her parents to court to get years of unpaid wages.

The woman sought nearly $130,000 compensation for working seven days a week in her parents' Canterbury supermarket without pay, but settled her case on the day it was due to be heard by the Employment Relations Authority in Christchurch.

Authority member James Chrichton suppressed the name of the woman, her parents, the location of the supermarket and details of the settlement.

The parents declined to comment on the dispute, but their daughter said outside court that she felt years of anxiety wash away as the case was settled.

"It's been worth it," she said. "It just feels like the stress is gone.  "I knew I had to do this. I felt unfairly treated. They didn't want to pay me a cent but finally they had to.

"It was all about control. ... I wanted to go flatting, but they wouldn't let me, so they prevented me from doing so."

The woman said the settlement was also a victory for her brother, who had been required to work part-time at their parents' supermarket, but instead of fighting he had turned his back on his parents.

In the woman's signed statement, obtained by The Press, she claimed she worked without pay for eight years, starting off after school for two years and then full-time for another six years.  She claimed she worked every day until her last year, when she was given one Sunday in three off.

She decreased her claim to take into account the full board at the family home and more than $12,000 she received from marketing companies.